Samuel Coleridge صموئيل كوليردج


  
Samuel Coleridge was born on October 21, 1772 in Devonshire, England. He was the youngest of 14 children. Coleridge proved to be a brilliant student from early on, and continued his excellence at Jesus College. At the same time, however, he was experimenting with the pleasures of alcohol, women, and most famously, opium. After school, Coleridge joined the Dragoons for a short time and then hastily married Sara Southey, the
younger sister of his friend, the future poet laureate Robert Southey. He earned a living as a Unitarian preacher for a short time while remaining in an incompatible marriage, and began to focus seriously on his love of writing. In the late 1790s, Coleridge began his famous friendship with William Wordsworth and his sister, Dorothy. Their intellectual and artistic exchanges culminated in Lyrical Ballads 1798, in which "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" was first published. The collection was a major landmark in the Romantic Movement; in it, the two writers exemplified the examination of the mundane, natural, and intensely subjective. Many of the poems were also written in everyday language, avoiding the ornamented styles of speech and elaborate rhyme schemes favored by poets of earlier periods. "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" is one exception to this trend, as in it Coleridge used both a rhyme scheme and words derived from Middle English. Soon after the publication of Lyrical Ballads, Coleridge fell in love with Sara Hutchinson, the sister of Wordsworth's future wife. Since he was already married, he was forced to channel his love for Sara Hutchinson into his poetry, where he referred to her by an anagram of her name, "Asra." Coleridge published the second version of "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" in 1817 in the volume Sibylline Leaves. In it he removed much of the original poem's deliberate archaism and added marginal glosses.
After travels abroad in Sicily and Malta, Coleridge returned to England in a state that worried his closest friends. His opium addiction had escalated to the point of straining his relationships with his wife and friends. Most notably, in 1810 Coleridge and Wordsworth suffered a falling out, and never entirely regained their former closeness. Eventually, on the verge of suicide, he moved in with a doctor who managed his care for the last eighteen years of his life. While in the doctor's care, Coleridge published the unfinished poems "Christabel" and "Kubla Khan", which became icons of Romantic poetry.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge died on July 25, 1834 at the age of 61. Upon his death, his good friend Charles Lamb claimed he could not grieve for Coleridge, saying: "It seemed to me that he long had been on the confines of the next world - that he had a hunger for eternity." According to Lamb, Coleridge spent his life striving for the eternal and sublime, so that death was for him the fulfillment of his deepest desire, rather than a dreaded end.
"The Picture,"
          Coleridge wrote "The Picture," or at least completed and published it, in 1802. It first appeared in The Morning Post of September 6, 1802, and was reprinted in The Poetical Register, and Repository of Fugitive Poetry for 1802 (1803).
 The Dream Within the Dream
          The narrator's explicitly-stated, or 'manifest,' dream for himself is emancipation, freedom from love's (day)dreams. His method of pursuing it is that of Gessner's lover, recreated as philosopheme: self-loss in the wilds of nature (or, for the poet, self-loss in the wilderness of verse). But one may wonder just what the "new joy" really is that "Beckons" him "on, . . . / Playmate, or guide!" (ll. 7-11, SL, 128). Nor is it long before the figure of "Love"—the pastoral, erotic motive—returns, "ensnared" in the very fancy of expulsion: in the form of a sulky Cupid who is chased by Nymphs, Oreads, Earth-winds, wingless Airs, Fays, and elfin Gnomes through eighteen lines of mocking reproof that imagine—in present tense—how the spirits of the place would punish "His little godship" if he had the temerity to cross their borders (ll. 28-45, SL, 129-30).22 Next in the cast of imaginary characters excluded from the scene appears a lovely maiden, around whose "tendril ringlets," "blue, delicate veins" and "half disclosed / . . . snowy bosom" the breeze, in this landscape, thinks the narrator, "Ne'er play'd the wanton" (ll. 58-67, SL, 129-31). Almost immediately thereafter, however, a worshipful youth (the "he" referred to below) arrives in his thoughts as the narrator's surrogate, to dream of the "stately virgin." "Like a dissolving thing" (l. 67), the narrative line disappears so quickly it is not at first clear that the narrator is still day-dreaming, that he does not actually see a woman reflected in the pooled stream beside which he sits.

          The images rise up before the narrator (and reader) "as things" (I borrow from the preface to "Kubla Khan," 52), when the narrator apostrophizes the "desert Stream": "no pool of thine," he protests,
Though clear as lake in latest summer-eve,
Did e'er reflect the stately virgin's robe,
Her face, her form divine, her downcast look
Contemplative! Ah see! her open palm
Presses her cheek and brow! her elbow rests
On the bare branch of half-uprooted tree,
That leans towards its mirror! He, meanwhile,
Who from her countenance turn'd, or look'd by stealth,
(For fear is true love's cruel nurse,) he now,
With stedfast gaze and unoffending eye,
Worships the watery idol, dreaming hopes
Delicious to the soul, but fleeting, vain,
E'en as that phantom-world on which he gazed.
She, sportive tyrant! with her left hand plucks
The heads of tall flowers that behind her grow,
Lychnis, and willow-herb, and fox-glove bells;
And suddenly, as one that toys with time,
Scatters them on the pool! Then all the charm
Is broken—all that phantom-world so fair
Vanishes, and a thousand circlets spread,
And each mis-shape the other.
          The scene is self-reflexive: it mirrors the narrator's own activity and his (repressed, or suppressed) wish for the "stately virgin's" presence (who is, in part, a condensation of Gessner's muses). The lines may also be supposed to turn upon specific, distorted textual (and personal) memories (compare with Gessner's "noch gestern hypftest du froh im weissen Sommer-kleid um mich her, wie die Wellen hier im Sonnen-Licht hypfen," 122).

          As figure of the poet, the narrator wishes for the muse's return; as lover, he wishes for (as she is later named) Isabel. His "part-ego" dreams for him:24 that, perhaps, one day his "Lewti" will be kind ("Lewti, or the Circassian Love-Chant," another poem of conventional, unrequited love, immediately precedes "The Picture" in Sibylline Leaves.) The youth apparently cherishes a delusion. But are his hopes of being noticed altogether so "vain"? The "virgin," presumably amused or impatient with his image-worship, destroys her image in the pool, in a gesture perhaps prescient (or reminiscent) of the Sara Hutchinson whom Coleridge recalled in a notebook entry of 1808 as wishing to be accounted "no Angel" (CN 3406 13.37). If one interprets the behavior of this "sportive tyrant" in the same way Freud interprets that of Jensen's Gradiva, however, her action may implicitly invite pursuit (see 1907 [1906], 75, 79). An important line added in 1828 suggests what here is only hinted: she tosses the flower-heads into the stream because her votary's gaze was "not unheeded" (l. 86, CP 1, 371). In any case, this dream foretells its (camouflaged) wish fulfilled: in the narrative future, the poet-narrator will retrieve the birch-bark picture Isabel has dropped into his dream, and follow her. His double's day-dream unmasks the narrator's inspiring "joy" within the "master-passion" in disguise: desire for the poem, desire for the maiden-muse.
Like its counterpart in the preface to "Kubla Khan," the "watery" idyll models the streamlike flow of association; it also recalls Aristotle's comparison of "the mental pictures" in dreams to "reflections in water," such that "movement destroys the clarity of the dream."25 Some dreams, Aristotle concedes, may be "both signs and causes" (379). In a sense, the dream of his other self functions as the 'sign' of the narrator's "true" wishes (for reunion with the muse or his lost self; to attract her notice and favor), and the "cause" of subsequent action in the narrative. But Aristotle is primarily concerned to demonstrate that "prophetic" dreams do not come from God: they are the children of coincidence. Likewise, the second movement of the narrator's dream emphasizes that what we gaze on is necessarily a "watery idol" (my emphasis).

          Once the "charm / Is broken," what David Punter (1990, 19) terms the "processes of primary narcissism," implicit before as a possibility of motive, become explicit.26 The narrator has comforted his dream-double by inviting the youth to "Stay awhile" that he may enjoy the restored "visions" which will return when "once more / The pool becomes a mirror." But the invitation heralds a second, more serious fall from grace that is elided in the preface to "Kubla Khan." "Behold," the narrator commands his surrogate (and reader):
Each wildflower on the marge inverted there,
And there the half-uprooted tree—but where,
O where the virgin's snowy arm, that lean'd
On its bare branch? He turns, and she is gone!
Homeward she steals through many a woodland maze
Which he shall seek in vain. Ill-fated youth!
Go, day by day, and waste thy manly prime
In mad Love-yearning by the vacant brook,
Till sickly thoughts bewitch thine eyes, and thou
Behold'st her shadow still abiding there,
The Naiad of the Mirror!  
The "phantom-world" of creative illusion resolves into delusion, the space of its "shadow." No longer does a young man observe (the figure of) a real woman reflected in a stream; held fast from pursuit of her by "fear" or the seductions of wish-fulfilling fantasy, he loses himself to "visions" in which she can only appear (to purloin Milton's epithet for the classical Urania) as the "empty dream" he himself has created. Confined to the asylum of "mad Love-yearning," the now "ill-fated youth" inhabits the realm of "imaginary Time" (SL, iii)—under the aspect of "suspended Animation" (Lectures 1, 124).
His spiritual malaise seems not unlike that of his previous textual counterpart, the "Gentle Lunatic." Coleridge alluded to the "Lunatic's" condition as a disguised reflection of his own, in the letter to Cottle of 1814 quoted earlier; the relevant lines, included in Sibylline Leaves, do not appear in the 1802 versions of "The Picture." Coleridge diagnosed his alter ego more fully in a letter to Edward Coleridge of 1826. Both letters quote "The Picture" with reference to Coleridge's problems of religious faith and belief. In 1826, analyzing his own recent "indolence leavening the resignation which it counterfeited," Coleridge lamented:




















REFERENCES
1-Adair, Patricia. The Waking Dream: A Study of Coleridge's Poetry. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1968.

2- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Aids to Reflection. Ed. John Beer. Vol. 9 of The Collected Works. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1993.

3- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Christabel, & c. 1816. Oxford and New York: Woodstock Books 1991.

4- Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Collected Letters. Ed. Earl Leslie Griggs. 6 vols. Oxford: Clarendon, 1956-1971.